Please be patient while it loads! The zip-file will automatically uncompress and you can view it offline on your browser. A selected bibliography from mainstream journals with sample quotations This page will provide you with source references that you can cut and paste. The sample quotations may give you an idea of the usefulness of that reference as well as the writing style.
In the situation where continued medical support would prolong suffering, doctors have the option of discontinuing support. If, according to Rachel, they choose that option on the basis of reducing suffering then they can do better with active euthanasia.
He points out the inconsistency in discontinuing medical support but not going further with active euthanasia, because he sees no moral distinction between active and passive euthanasia—they are both intentional acts to terminate a life which is in fact murder, but more on that later.
Simply letting someone die is morally the same as killing someone. When a doctor lets a patient die, the doctor is not doing nothing. In other words, contrary to how it may seem, doctors are acting by not acting.
One is acting in the choice to not do anything. Active and Passive Euthanasia By withholding treatment, the doctor is actually committing murder. It seems to me that Rachels puts doctors in a situation where they must strictly either be torturers or murderers.
If it is decided that medical support should no longer be given, the doctor is immediately a murderer. Both forms of euthanasia are murder just like Rachels said, and immoral.
I recall the example given by Kant where he describes the duty that an individual has to go on living despite the hardships.
Thus we have no right to take it away from others or ourselves—only to prolong it.This collection of essays addresses some of the most important issues in philosophy, involving God, the mind, freedom, knowledge, and ethics.
It can accompany James Rachels and Stuart Rachels’ introductory text, Problems from Philosophy, or it can stand alone with great vetconnexx.com Truth about the World and Problems from Philosophy were James Rachels.
More Essay Examples on Ethics Rubric. My Thesis: James Rachels’ argument in the article “Active and Passive Euthanasia” challenges the traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia, stating that there is no important moral difference between the two.
In this age of anxiety when the earth and all of the life on it appear to be threatened, Cicero’s essay “On Ageing” brings hope. Thanks to medical miracles and improved nutrition, longevity has been expanding at the rate of three months a year since The late philosopher James Rachels published one of the most salient pieces on the euthanasia (E) debate in the New England Journal of Medicine titled “Active and Passive Euthanasia.” Here is a brief outline of his argument.
The distinction between active euthanasia (AE) and passive (PE) is thought crucial.
James Rachels wrote 86 essays and other short pieces. His best-known essays (such as "Active and Passive Euthanasia") are in his books of collected papers: Can Ethics Provide Answers? and The Legacy of vetconnexx.com are some other articles you can download.
Critical Summary: Active and Passive Euthanasia (James Rachels) James Rachels argues against the traditional doctrine in medicine that prohibits the physician from taking any action which would contribute to the death of a patient.